After much anticipation, X-Men â97, a direct continuation to X-Men: The Animated Series from the 1990s, hits Disney Plus this week. But itâs not the first time Marvel has dusted off the old series and revived it for a nostalgic new millennium.
Marvel Comics itself took a swing with X-Men â92, published in 2015 and technically a Secret Wars tie-in (but donât worry about it). For â92, writers Chad Bowers and Chris Sims and artist Scott Koblish had to figure out how to make a comic book story that felt like a beloved cartoon show closely based on â90s comics, without just replicating â90s comics themselves. X-Men: The Animated Series definitely had its own vibe â but blocky animation doesnât translate to still images, and once you put character designs ripped right out of the comics back on the page, they just look⌠like theyâre from comics. Rogue and Gambitâs outrageous accents? From the comics. Stormâs operatic diction? The comics.
X-Men: The Animated Series was beloved because it was a truly excellent introduction not just to the characters of the X-Men, but their most compelling comic book storylines â or at least as close as the folks behind the show could get given television standards of the time. And so Bowers and Sims and Koblish made an interesting choice: According to their X-Men â92, the thing that makes a story feel like the â92 animated series is⌠censorship.
In the realm of cartoon adaptations of long-running comics series, X-Men: The Animated Series has always set itself apart by how closely it mimicked the comics it was based on. You could almost call The Animated Series more of a translation than an adaptation, with the way it directly adapted even comics stories published during the showâs run.
Or at least, it adapted them as best as it could â given a very different set of content standards.
Shall we go down the list? No cussing, so everyone, even Wolverine, uses incredible minced oaths. Every bad guy must show signs of life after theyâve been knocked down. Minimize direct and implied references to sex, religion, drugs, torture, funerals, and also any word derived from âkill.â And no blood! Sure, Wolverineâs got a healing factor, but we canât show him getting bashed up too bad or running around too naked (comics love this). Instead, letâs emphasize his enhanced senses. And make sure the Sentinels are front and center; censors are totally fine with slicing and dicing robots or electrocuting them with Stormâs lightning, blasting holes through them with Cyclopsâ force beams, bashing them to bits with Rogueâs super strength, and exploding them with Gambitâs playing cards.
X-Men wasnât unusual for its era in the restrictions placed on it. But those rules were one thing for shows where Spider-Man or Batman punched bad guys until they hit the floor and groaned. It was quite another for the X-Men, whose most popular guy was a man made of knives who was constantly receiving wounds. And it was even more fraught for a close adaptation of X-Men stories, whose general popularity is locked around soap operatic romantic and sexual tension. Gambit and Rogue donât want to get engaged, folks, they want to have piping-hot impossible-because-of-her-mutation premarital sex.
So when you set out to define what makes an âX-Men: The Animated Series-style storyâ different from an âX-Men comics-style story,â at some point youâre just going to be listing all the ways in which the comics stories had to change for kidsâ TV. As a comic series trying to replicate the Animated Series tone, X-Men â92 simply leaned into that, with a story about the X-Men fighting censorship itself.
In â92, the X-Men face a villain they never could have fought in the animated series: Cassandra Nova, a character that could not be more at odds with the â90s era of X-Men if she tried. Cassandra was the first major villain of Grant Morrison and Frank Quitelyâs New X-Men, a run still renowned today for its radical redefinition of the X-Men. The first page of their first X-Men comic is a splash image of Cyclops and Wolverine casually dismembering a Sentinel, as Cyclops says, pointedly, âWolverine, you can probably stop doing that now.â
Cassandra Nova was Morrison and Quitelyâs first attempt to fill the antagonistic hole left by sweeping Sentinels off the table; a moral inverse to Professor X, who wanted to destroy all that he wanted to uphold. But for â92 Bowers and Sims and Koblish gave Cassandra a new hook â this time, she doesnât want to kill all mutants. She wants to bowdlerize all mutants.
She captures the X-Men and either brainwashes them into compliance â Wolverine goes pacifist, Gambit puts a promise ring on Rogue and they swear to keep it abstinent until marriage â or traps them inside their own minds. In the end, Wolverine regains his claws after re-realizing they can be used to help people; Rogue and Gambit snap out of it when they remember that thereâs more to being able to touch somebody than sex and marriage. The X-Men win the day, gaining a victory over simplistic reductions of morality.
The team behind X-Men â97 certainly seemed to have asked themselves some of the same questions as the team behind X-Men â92: Is this kidsâ show revival for kids, or the grown adults who loved the first show? Do we preserve the bowdlerized â90s tone? Will it even feel like the ârealâ X-Men cartoon without it?
Time has lent a measure of humor to the idea of a Wolverine who canât cut anybody but robots and will only drink beer if someone could reasonably mistake it for soda. Itâs quaint to look back on a time when kidsâ cartoons were so limited in what they could portray, all because of a presumption of a pearl-clutching public.
Those presumptions have evolved â but itâs worth remembering that they havenât gone away. There are new frontiers in the slow battle of attrition between kidsâ TV showrunners and studio censors, and new creators pushing the envelope. After all, youâll find every episode of X-Men: â97 on Disney Plus, but you wonât find every episode of Bluey.
Hereâs hoping that in another couple of decades, 2024âs broadcast standards seem as quaint as 1997âs, bub.